In Re Mark Molina v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Mark Molina v. the State of Texas (In Re Mark Molina v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 10, 2023
No. 04-23-00422-CR
IN RE Mark MOLINA
Original Proceeding 1
ORDER
On April 26, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on May 10, 2023.
_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of May, 2023.
_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CR4278, styled State of Texas v. Mark Molina, pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kristina Escalona presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Mark Molina v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-molina-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.