In Re: Mark Milligan v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Mark Milligan v. the State of Texas (In Re: Mark Milligan v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed April 25, 2024
SIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00483-CV
IN RE MARK MILLIGAN, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1127465
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court is relator’s April 23, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus
challenging certain orders as void.
Upon review, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re
Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July
14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a) (requiring
complete list of parties and names and addresses of counsel), 52.3(b) (requiring table
of contents), 52.3(c) (requiring index of authorities), 52.3(f) (requiring issues or
points presented), 52.3(j) (requiring certification that relator has reviewed petition and concluded every factual statement in petition is supported by competent
evidence included in the appendix or record), 52.7(a) (requiring sufficient record).
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
240483F.P05 /Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Mark Milligan v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-milligan-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.