Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Mark H.

In re Mark H.

259 A.D.2d 1040, 689 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3471
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 1040 (In re Mark H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Mark H., 259 A.D.2d 1040, 689 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3471 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Amended order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this Family Court Act article 10 proceeding alleging sexual abuse, Family Court properly gave collateral estoppel effect to respondent’s plea of guilty to charges of sexual abuse in a parallel criminal proceeding (see, Matter of Suffolk [1041]*1041County Dept. of Social Servs. [Michael V.] v James M., 83 NY2d 178, 182-183; Matter of Jimmy A., 218 AD2d 734, 735; Matter of Sarah L., 207 AD2d 1016). (Appeal from Amended Order of Niagara County Family Court, Batt, J. — Abuse.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Hurlbutt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suffolk County Deptartment of Social Services v. James M.
630 N.E.2d 636 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
In re Sarah L.
207 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
In re Jimmy A.
218 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 1040, 689 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-h-nyappdiv-1999.