in Re Mark Eugene Engle
This text of in Re Mark Eugene Engle (in Re Mark Eugene Engle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
pz,- /s*- 000 90 - CK_ RECE¢\!ED\N
:",`-;)’ f/-\. l . ' .. The Six§:rv;ié>isir?c;§eas Ec)urt of Appeals FH_ED |N MAY 2 2 2015 Sixth Ec)urt D‘F Appeals The Co~u¢;t O~prpea‘S Bi-State austice Bldg. SiXth D’istric‘t ?EXETKHN@,TQXGS ‘ ' 100 N. State Line Ave. #20 MAY 2 2 2015
Debra Autrey, Clerk Texarkana, Texas 75501-5952
Texa§rkéfna, ?Fe>'cé$
.'D...'..___ :,1 . . _. . award .~1\.. mm
Leave to File
writ cf Mandamus
Mark Eugené Engle v. The State of Texas Trial Ease NO. 29110
Honorable Judge Beacom
In the 554th District Cuurt
Parties: Mark Eugene Engle Judge Beacom #1958430 Prn-Se ' Df the 354th
Eonnally Unit District Eourt
899 F.M. 632 Kennedy,TX 78119
(I)
iTable of Enntenta
Identity et The Partiea
Index of Authoritiee
Statement et The Eaee
leaue Preeented with Argument
Petitien eheuld be granted because Relater has Demonetrated that his motion has been filed er brought to the attention of`the"Triel`Eourt, or en the alternativefis it am:abueewof discretion for the trial Judge net te rule en a timely tiled metien.
Eenclueion and Prayer
Bertificate et Service
Exhibit A Attached
(II)
Index of Authuritiee
Canadian Helicoptere Ltd v witting, 876 S.M.Zd 304,305 (Texas 1994)
Johnson V Fourth Eourt of Appeala 700 B.M.Zd 916,917 (Texas 1985)
Btoner v Maseey, 556 S.U.Zd 843,846 (Texas 1979) ln re Villereal, 96 S.U.Zd 706,710-711 (T§x.App.
Ammerillo 2003)
(5)
Statement£of the Ease
0n January 20th 2015 relator sent a notion to add additional designation issue to Judge Beacom that would prove relator's actual innocence in regards to the invalid search warrant andaaffidavit for search warrant and orders from theaexamining'trial. 0n Febuary 9th 2015 relator sent a motion To Return Property. 0n December 19th 2014 relator.filed a motion Designation The Grand Jury Minutes. 0n April 20th 2015 relator sent by Certified Mail (see EXhibit "A" attached green card and receipt) motion to Show Eause and motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. The Honorable Judge has a duty to rule on_an timely motion which
is a Judicial Act. lt is an abuse of Discretion not to act.
(L+)
Issue Presented
Is it an Abuse of Discretion for the Judge to not rule on a timely filed motion.
0n December 19th 2014 relator sent a motion to the Judge for Designation of the Grandjury Minutes. See (C;R.Pg.136).0@u3anuaryy20thd2015Hrelator sent a motion for Add: itional Deignation to prove his actual innocence on an invalid search warrant and aff- idavit of search warrant and orders from the examing trial. 0n Febuary 9th 2015 relator sent a motion to Eeturn Broperty to the Judge. 0n March ch 2015 he sent a motion Eesi- gnation of`record on an incomplete record. 0n April 20th 2015 he sent a motion to 5how Cause to the Judge and a motion to Dismiss with Prejudice by Certified Mail see Exhibit
"A" attached with Eertified Mail Receipt.
Arguments
Btandard of Review
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only in limited circunstances.
Ea Adian HelicoptersLtd v witting, 076 B.U.2d 304,305 (Texas'199h§.
Ittis.the Burden; of the relator to show entitlement to the relief being request
ed..See'Benerally Johnson v Fourth Eourt of Appeals, 700 5.w.2d 916,917 (Texas 1985),(0
riginal Proceeding). In order to be entitled to relief, the relator must show the foll- owing: (1) a legal duty to perform; (2) a demand for performance; and (3) a refusal to
act. See Stoner v Massey, 506 S.U.Zd 0#3,046 (Texas 1979).
with the facts presented relator has shown that all motions are over (30) days
’with the attached Exhibit "A" attached green card Eertified Receipt.
Relator's petition should be granted because relator has demostrated that
his motion has been filed or brought totthe attention of the trial court.
The Burden is on the relator to show that the District Court knew of it's Duty
to act and neglected to perform it. 5ee: In re Villareal,v96 S.w}Bd 700,710-711 (Tex.App
Amarillo 2003) Relator has meet his Burden, he is entitled to relief. 5ee: Stoner v Masi
sey, 506 5.w.2d AtBA6.
Conclusion and Prayer
Relator's petition should be Branted, he has demonstrated that the trial court
has failed to act in a timely fashion-
wherefore, premises considered. Relator Prays the Bourt Erants relator leave to
file writ of Mandamus.
j;%;pec%fuwly §ubmi§:ed,
Mark Eugene§Eogie May 1Bth 2015
Dertificate of Service
0n thisaday the 1Bth of May 2015, relator sent this leave to file Mandamus to
the 6th 00urt of Appeals of Texarkana Texas Clerk Debbie Autrey from the Eonnally Unit
899 F.M. 632, Kenedy Texas 70119 by first class mail`
Mark Eug§;eifigle
Exhibit
lIAll
Attachment
f1)rGreen Eard Certified with Certified Receipt.
l _Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted De|ivery' is desired.
l Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you.
l Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits_
\ 1 1:| Agent f E| Addressee 5
l 1 Artic|e Addressed to:
be a/V{‘€FC . 1 Conn Ajmh:¢l$+m,i(or“
31~¢¢/0.
2 Artlcle Nu_mber
(_7'_r_ansfer- from serv/_ce label) ;7 0 / l
5 PS Form 3811 February 2004 '
Re`cgjve F'ch).;/Fn'nt/q/.U ame) 7
"ls delivery address different f ` 4
C` Date of Delivery 1_
El Reglstered - " ' ` - v|:l lnsu_red Mail l:| C. O. D_.
4. Restricted De|ivery? (_Extra Fee)
Dornestlc 11eturn Receipt
- U. S. Post'al Servicem - CERT|F|ED 1V|A|LW RECE|PT
__El Yes
D//O ooo/ 43@5' 733‘/’ 1
102595- 02 M~1540 l
(Endorsement Requir'ed)
Toeal Po_sr_age a Fees $
se"' bail bona /Vlee 16
15 qua 131$111(’§( gmng
Slreel, Apt.' No.,
or PO Box No. NU };tv
U` _ . m (Domestic Mail Only, No Insurance Coverage Provided) l'\"l
[\- , For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com® 53 @FF§C§AL .USE 51 Postage $ _ ,._-| Certi_fled Fee
m .
g Return Receipt Fee' P°|_s|nnark m (EndorsementFlequired) _ era
cl Restrlcted Delivery Fee
r-=I
r-=|
l:l
'_q
r-`l
El
r\
Ci!y, Sfafa, Z/P+4 n
(7)
ll 1 PS Form 3800, August 2006
001/419 vour‘{hou$~€
See Reverse for lnstructions"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Mark Eugene Engle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-eugene-engle-texcrimapp-2015.