in Re Mark E. Lee
This text of in Re Mark E. Lee (in Re Mark E. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00592-CV
In re Mark E. Lee
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N
Relator Mark E. Lee filed a petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition
directed to his former trial counsel.1 However, we may issue such writs only against a district judge
or county judge sitting in our district, or to enforce our jurisdiction, none of which are
implicated here. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6; Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(b); see also In re Conway,
No. 01-14-00612-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10333, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
Sept. 16, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing for want
of jurisdiction mandamus petition seeking to compel relator’s former trial counsel to provide
case file). The petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________
Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Filed: September 25, 2014
1 Lee also filed a motion for leave to file this petition, which we dismiss as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Mark E. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-e-lee-texapp-2014.