in Re: Mark Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 30, 2015
Docket08-15-00012-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Mark Brown (in Re: Mark Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Mark Brown, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ IN RE No. 08-15-00012-CV § MARK BROWN, ORIGINAL PROCEEDING § RELATOR. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF § MANDAMUS §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Mark Brown, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable

Roy Ferguson, Judge of the 394th District Court of Culberson County, Texas, requesting that we

direct Respondent to withdraw an order granting a motion to compel discovery. We previously

granted Relator’s motion to stay the discovery order pending our review of the mandamus

petition. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 136. Based on the record before us, we

conclude that Relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we lift the stay and deny mandamus relief.

January 28, 2015 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Mark Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-brown-texapp-2015.