In Re Mark Anthony Ortega v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00213-CV
IN RE Mark Anthony ORTEGA, Relator
Original Proceeding 1
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 16, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On April 2, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting this court vacate
the March 18, 2025, trial court order denying in part and granting in part plaintiff’s motion to
compel and for sanctions rendered in the underlying proceedings. Mandamus is an extraordinary
remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion
or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker
v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition
and the record, this court concludes relator did not show he is entitled to the relief sought. The
petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2024CV08834, styled Mark Anthony Ortega v. Diana Astudillo de Leon, pending in the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cesar Garcia presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Mark Anthony Ortega v. the State of Texas (In Re Mark Anthony Ortega v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.