in Re Mark A. Cantu
This text of in Re Mark A. Cantu (in Re Mark A. Cantu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00430-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE MARK A. CANTU
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam
On December 7, 2021, relator Mark A. Cantu filed a pro se petition for writ of
mandamus through which he alleges that the assigned judge erred in continuing to
preside over trial court cause number C-4003-19-A in the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo
County, Texas, after Cantu filed an objection to the judge’s assignment. See TEX. GOV’T
CODE ANN. § 74.053.
The Court requests that the real parties in interest, J. Michael Moore and the
Hidalgo County District Attorney’s Office, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or
before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2,
52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 10th day of December, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Mark A. Cantu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-a-cantu-texapp-2021.