In re Mark A. B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mark A. B.

270 A.D.2d 928, 706 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3425

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 928 (In re Mark A. B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mark A. B., 270 A.D.2d 928, 706 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The petition, alleging that respondent committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree

[929]*929(Penal Law § 130.65 [3]), together with the supporting depositions of the victim and his brother detailing the acts, complies with Family Court Act § 311.2 (3) (cf., Matter of Neftalí D., 85 NY2d 631, 634). The proof is legally sufficient to establish that respondent committed the acts for the purpose of his sexual gratification (see, People v Smithers, 255 AD2d 916, 917, lv denied 92 NY2d 1054; People v Beecher, 225 AD2d 943, 944-945; Matter of Olivia YY., 209 AD2d 892; People v Farren, 178 AD2d 913). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The petition, alleging that respondent committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree

[929]*929(Penal Law § 130.65 [3]), together with the supporting depositions of the victim and his brother detailing the acts, complies with Family Court Act § 311.2 (3) (cf., Matter of Neftalí D., 85 NY2d 631, 634). The proof is legally sufficient to establish that respondent committed the acts for the purpose of his sexual gratification (see, People v Smithers, 255 AD2d 916, 917, lv denied 92 NY2d 1054; People v Beecher, 225 AD2d 943, 944-945; Matter of Olivia YY., 209 AD2d 892; People v Farren, 178 AD2d 913). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 928, 706 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mark-a-b-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack