In re Marjorie Julia, R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Marjorie Julia, R.

283 A.D.2d 364, 724 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6611

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 364 (In re Marjorie Julia, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Marjorie Julia, R., 283 A.D.2d 364, 724 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara Schechter, J.), entered on or about January 14, 1998, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committing the child’s guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the finding that the agency fulfilled its obligation to exercise diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, in particular here, to arrange visitation. The evidence clearly shows that the child’s best interests would be served by freeing her for adoption by her foster parents. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara Schechter, J.), entered on or about January 14, 1998, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committing the child’s guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the finding that the agency fulfilled its obligation to exercise diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, in particular here, to arrange visitation. The evidence clearly shows that the child’s best interests would be served by freeing her for adoption by her foster parents. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 364, 724 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marjorie-julia-r-nyappdiv-2001.