in Re Marissa Peterson
This text of in Re Marissa Peterson (in Re Marissa Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 1, 2023
No. 04-22-00622-CV
IN RE Marissa PETERSON
Original Proceeding 1
ORDER
On September 22, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion to stay trial court proceedings pending the resolution of her petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted on October 3, 2022. After considering the petition, real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on October 3, 2022 is LIFTED.
It is so ORDERED on February 1, 2023.
_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of February, 2023.
_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-19610, styled Marissa Peterson v. HEB Grocery Co., LP., pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Marissa Peterson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marissa-peterson-texapp-2023.