In Re Mario Lavell Cockerham v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)·Decided May 27, 2026·No. 09-26-00132-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-26-00132-CR

IN RE MARIO LAVELL COCKERHAM

Original Proceeding

253rd District Court of Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. 26,494

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 30, 2026, we received a petition for a writ of mandamus from Mario Lavell Cockerham. Upon receiving the petition, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties of specific procedural deficiencies in the mandamus petition and directed Cockerham to file a compliant petition by April 14, 2026. As of today, Cockerham has not complied with the notice issued by the appellate clerk. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for want of prosecution without ruling on the merits of Relator’s petition and without prejudice to Relator’s filing a new original proceeding that

complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 9.4, 9.5, 52.3.

PETITION DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on (Date) Opinion Delivered (Date) Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Mario Lavell Cockerham v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Mario Lavell Cockerham v. the State of Texas (In Re Mario Lavell Cockerham v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.