in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 29, 2022·No. 03-22-00446-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00446-CV

In re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Mario-Arnoldo:Yarrito has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining that the Travis County district clerk has failed to file certain documents in an

underlying proceeding. As an intermediate appellate court, this Court has no jurisdiction to issue

a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, see

Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(a); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston

[1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding), and our jurisdiction is not implicated here. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Filed: July 29, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito (in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)