in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito
This text of in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito (in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00446-CV
In re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Mario-Arnoldo:Yarrito has filed a petition for writ of mandamus
complaining that the Travis County district clerk has failed to file certain documents in an
underlying proceeding. As an intermediate appellate court, this Court has no jurisdiction to issue
a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, see
Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(a); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding), and our jurisdiction is not implicated here. Accordingly, the
petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith
Filed: July 29, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Mario-Arnold:Yarrito, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mario-arnoldyarrito-texapp-2022.