In re Mario A.B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mario A.B.

104 A.D.3d 1269, 961 N.Y.S.2d 354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 2013

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.3d 1269 (In re Mario A.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mario A.B., 104 A.D.3d 1269, 961 N.Y.S.2d 354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Ap[1270]*1270peal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Lisa Bloch Rodwin, J.), entered December 29, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order adjudged that respondent Angelo B. neglected the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Alissia E.C. (104 AD3d 1269 [2013]). Present — Centra, J.R, Peradotto, Garni, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ap[1270]*1270peal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Lisa Bloch Rodwin, J.), entered December 29, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order adjudged that respondent Angelo B. neglected the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Alissia E.C. (104 AD3d 1269 [2013]). Present — Centra, J.R, Peradotto, Garni, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.3d 1269, 961 N.Y.S.2d 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mario-ab-nyappdiv-2013.