In re Marino

117 F.3d 1425, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24396, 1997 WL 362117
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 1, 1997
Docket96-55389
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 117 F.3d 1425 (In re Marino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Marino, 117 F.3d 1425, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24396, 1997 WL 362117 (9th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

117 F.3d 1425

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re: SALVATORE JAMES MARINO; Dolores Carmen MARINO, Debtors.
Carolyn A. DYE, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellant,
v.
KENNETH J. RIVERA, individually and as trustee of the
Kenneth J. Rivera Trust, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-55389.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 6, 1997
July 1, 1997.

Before: BROWNING, FLETCHER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges

MEMORANDUM*

Carolyn Dye, Chapter 7 trustee, appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel("BAP") denying her request to avoid as preferential transfers deeds of trust to two parcels of property, one located in Riverside County (the "Riverside" property) and the other in Orange County (the "Orange County" property), given to Kenneth J. Rivera by the debtor James Marino.

Decisions of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel are reviewed de novo. In re Alsberg, 68 F.3d 312, 314 (9th Cir.1995). We review the bankruptcy court's conclusions of law de novo and the court's findings of fact for clear error. Id. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its opinion.

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorholt v. Linquist (In Re Dorholt, Inc.)
239 B.R. 521 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 F.3d 1425, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24396, 1997 WL 362117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marino-ca9-1997.