In re Maria Daniella R.
This text of 84 A.D.3d 1384 (In re Maria Daniella R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Wolff, J.), dated July 13, 2010, which, after a hearing, found that she neglected the subject children.
Ordered that the fact-finding order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The mother’s repeated use of marijuana provided a basis for a finding of neglect (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [iii]). The mother’s claim that the children’s out-of-court statements were not reliable is without merit. The out-of-court statements made to the caseworker by the two oldest daughters served to cross-corroborate each other, and those statements were further corroborated by the testimony of the caseworker that the mother admitted to smoking marijuana (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112 [1987]; Matter of Andrew W. [Randolph A.W.], 83 AD3d 727 [2011]; Matter of Dave D. [Jean D.], 71 AD3d 673 [2010]). That evidence, together with a negative inference drawn from the mother’s failure to testify, was sufficient to support the Family Court’s finding of neglect (see Matter of Charlie S. [Rong S.], 82 AD3d 1248 [2011]). Covello, J.E, Eng, Leventhal and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.3d 1384, 924 N.Y.S.2d 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maria-daniella-r-nyappdiv-2011.