In re Margulies

576 A.2d 858, 120 N.J. 309, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 311
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 20, 1990·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court setting forth that FREDERICK S. MARGU[310] LIES of LITTLE FALLS, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1987, was publicly censured by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and the report further setting forth the recommendation that reciprocal discipline in the form of a public reprimand be imposed on FREDERICK S. MARGULIES for misrepresentations that he made to Counsel to the Board on Professional Responsibility which, in part, led to his public censure, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the findings of the Disciplinary Review Board are hereby adopted and FREDERICK S. MARGULIES is hereby publicly reprimanded for conduct in violation of RPC 8.4(c); and it is further

ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board, together with this Order and the full record of the matter, be added as a permanent part of the file of said FREDERICK S. MARGULIES as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey; and it is further

ORDERED that FREDERICK S. MARGULIES reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Margulies, 576 A.2d 858, 120 N.J. 309, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 311 (N.J. 1990).

576 A.2d 858 (In re Margulies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.