In re Margolis

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Margolis

735 A.2d 566, 161 N.J. 139, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1369

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 9, 1999·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on May 3, 1999, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARTIN G. MAR-[140] GOLIS of VERONA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1961, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARTIN G. MARGOLIS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on May 3, 1999, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARTIN G. MAR-[140] GOLIS of VERONA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1961, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARTIN G. MARGOLIS is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Margolis, 735 A.2d 566, 161 N.J. 139, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1369 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

735 A.2d 566 (In re Margolis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.