in Re Margie Rittenhouse

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Margie Rittenhouse

DecidedJanuary 7, 2009

Docket04-08-00900-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Margie Rittenhouse (in Re Margie Rittenhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Margie Rittenhouse, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00900-CV

IN RE Margie RITTENHOUSE and Bernie Rittenhouse

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 7, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that

relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX .

R. APP . P. 52.8(a). Relators shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 08-07-26509-CV, styled Margie Rittenhouse and Bernie Rittenhouse v. Ronnie Vance and Alora Loveland, pending in the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas, the Honorable W att Murrah presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI