in Re: Marcus Redd

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 1, 2002
• Docket: 01-02-00609-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 1, 2002

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-02-00609-CV

IN RE MARCUS REDD, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

O P I N I O N

Relator, Marcus Redd, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel either the district clerk or the clerk of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals to forward him the record in trial court cause no. 803061 of the 351st District Court of Harris County, Texas.

Relator's appeal of his August, 19, 1999 conviction and 25-year sentence for aggravated robbery in cause no. 803061 was assigned to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. The record was filed in that court free of charge to relator. On July 19, 2001, the Fourteenth Court affirmed his conviction in appellate cause no. 14-99-01122-CR. Mandate issued on November 2, 2001.

We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus to the district clerk unless he or she is interfering with our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (Vernon Supp. 2002); In re Strickhausen, 994 S.W.2d 936, 936 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding); Lesikar v. Anthony, 750 S.W.2d 338, 339 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, orig. proceeding). In this case, the district clerk is not interfering with our appellate jurisdiction because there is no appeal pending. Nor do we have any authority to issue a writ of mandamus to the clerk of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. The clerk of that court is not a judge, nor is he interfering with our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon Supp. 2002). A complaint about an act or omission of a court clerk may generally be made by filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the district court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 24.011 (Vernon Supp. 2002); In re Bernard, 993 S.W.2d 453, 454 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding).

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hedges, Jennings, and Keyes.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.