In re Marcus
This text of 286 A.D. 96 (In re Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent, an attorney, is charged with professional misconduct in that he converted to his own use the funds of clients on two occasions, one in 1942, and the other in 1951. The Referee has found that these funds were received in trust for specific purposes and that respondent appropriated them for his own use in disregard of his fiduciary obligations. The record fully supports this conclusion. Respondent’s explanations not only fail to disprove the charges but are unworthy of belief. The respondent should be disbarred.
Peck, P. J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ., concur.
Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D. 96, 141 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marcus-nyappdiv-1955.