In re Marcus

768 A.2d 176, 167 N.J. 33, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 328
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 21, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 768 A.2d 176 (In re Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Marcus, 768 A.2d 176, 167 N.J. 33, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 328 (N.J. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that a letter of admonition should be issued to FREDERIC L. MARCUS of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, for violation of RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect client’s interests upon termination of representation) and RPC 8 .4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 A.2d 176, 167 N.J. 33, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marcus-nj-2001.