In re Marcus

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Marcus

768 A.2d 176, 167 N.J. 33, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 328

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 21, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that a letter of admonition should be issued to FREDERIC L. MARCUS of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, for violation of RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect client’s interests upon termination of representation) and RPC 8 .4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that a letter of admonition should be issued to FREDERIC L. MARCUS of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, for violation of RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect client’s interests upon termination of representation) and RPC 8 .4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Marcus, 768 A.2d 176, 167 N.J. 33, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 328 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

768 A.2d 176 (In re Marcus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.