in Re: Marcus Kyle Free

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 11, 2011
Docket13-11-00166-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Marcus Kyle Free (in Re: Marcus Kyle Free) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Marcus Kyle Free, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-0000166-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG


IN RE MARCUS KYLE FREE


On Application for Writ of Prohibition or Injunction

Or for Expedited Ruling on Appellant’s Motion to Suspend.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]

Relator, Marcus Kyle Free, filed an “Application for Writ of Prohibition or Injunction or for Expedited Ruling on Appellant’s Motion to Suspend”[2] in the above cause on March 28, 2011.  The Court requested and received a response to the application from the real party in interest herein, Cathy Diane Lewis.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the “Application for Writ of Prohibition or Injunction or for Expedited Ruling on Appellant’s Motion to Suspend” and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.  Accordingly, the application for writ of prohibition or injunction or for expedited ruling is DENIED.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a), (d).

                                                                                                            PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

11th day of April, 2011.



[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

[2] In an appeal pending before this Court in appellate cause number 13-11-00113-CV, relator had previously filed a “Motion to Suspend Enforcement of the Injunctive Relief Portions of the Final Judgment.”  The Court’s ruling on that motion will be rendered by separate order issued in that cause. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Marcus Kyle Free, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marcus-kyle-free-texapp-2011.