In re Marcus C.
136 A.D.2d 971, 524 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1531
Opinion
—Motion for permission to appeal as a poor person denied. Memorandum: The motion to appeal as a poor person is denied with leave to renew. The motion papers lack a financial affidavit sworn to by the appellants and an affidavit setting forth facts showing merit to the appeal (see, CPLR 1101; Matter of Teeter v Reed, 57 AD2d 735). Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Marcus C., 136 A.D.2d 971, 524 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
136 A.D.2d 971 (In re Marcus C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Teeter v. Reed
57 A.D.2d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)