in Re Marcos Gonzalez and Elvira Castano
This text of in Re Marcos Gonzalez and Elvira Castano (in Re Marcos Gonzalez and Elvira Castano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 28, 2007
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On March 16, 2007, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief. The court has considered relators' petition and motion, and is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(c), 30 (restricted appeal). Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a), 52.8(a). Relators shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
1. This original proceeding arises out of Cause No. 22110, styled Foremost County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Elvira G. Castano, M. "Marc" Gonzalez, and Wurzbach Interests, Inc., pending in the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas, the Honorable Thomas F. Lee presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Marcos Gonzalez and Elvira Castano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marcos-gonzalez-and-elvira-castano-texapp-2007.