In Re Marco A. Cantu & Ayssa Cantu Hayes v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)·Decided July 1, 2026·No. 04-26-00516-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-26-00516-CV

IN RE Marco A. CANTU & Ayssa Cantu Hayes Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 1, 2026

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF DISMISSED AS MOOT

On July 29, 2026, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator has not shown that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2005-CVQ-000954-D3, styled Julian Gonzalez et al. v. Entex Gas Marketing Company et al.,, pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Jack W. Marr presiding.

04-26-00516-CV

mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The motion for temporary relief is dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Marco A. Cantu & Ayssa Cantu Hayes v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Marco A. Cantu & Ayssa Cantu Hayes v. the State of Texas (In Re Marco A. Cantu & Ayssa Cantu Hayes v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)