In re Marchese

599 A.2d 899, 126 N.J. 412, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1462
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 6, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 599 A.2d 899 (In re Marchese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Marchese, 599 A.2d 899, 126 N.J. 412, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1462 (N.J. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

ANDREW MARCHESE of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREW MARCHESE is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ANDREW MARCHESE, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jersey City Redevelopment v. Costello
599 A.2d 899 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 A.2d 899, 126 N.J. 412, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marchese-nj-1992.