in Re Marchelo L. Pryce
This text of in Re Marchelo L. Pryce (in Re Marchelo L. Pryce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00088-CV
In re Marchelo L. Pryce
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s
failure to rule on several pro se motions filed within the last two months. Although mandamus
relief is generally available when the trial court has failed to rule on a properly filed motion
within a reasonable length of time, a delay of less than three months is not unreasonable. See In
re Whitfield, No. 03-18-00564-CV, 2018 WL 4140735, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 29, 2018,
orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana
Filed: March 3, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Marchelo L. Pryce, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marchelo-l-pryce-texapp-2022.