in Re Marcel L Williams
This text of in Re Marcel L Williams (in Re Marcel L Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; Opinion Filed February 28, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00255-CV
IN RE MARCEL L. WILLIAMS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16-42251-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Osborne, and Justice Reichek Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Marcel L. Williams filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that
court reporter Sasha Brooks has not filed the reporter’s record in Mr. Williams’
direct appeal (appellate cause #05-19-01022-CR), despite the Court’s order
instructing Ms. Brooks to do so.
We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus to a court reporter or the
district clerk unless they are interfering with our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX.
GOV’T. CODE. ANN. §§ 22.221(a), (b); In re Strickhausen, 994 S.W.2d 936, 936
(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (no authority
to issue writ of mandamus to court reporter or district clerk unless they are interfering with appellate court’s appellate jurisdiction.); Lesikar v. Anthony, 750
S.W.2d 338, 339 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, orig. proceeding) (same).
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
/Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
200255F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Marcel L Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-marcel-l-williams-texapp-2020.