In re Manufacturers Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Manufacturers Trust Co.

248 A.D. 905, 290 N.Y.S. 715, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8019

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 905 (In re Manufacturers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Manufacturers Trust Co., 248 A.D. 905, 290 N.Y.S. 715, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county allowing certain proposed amendments to ease on appeal reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. While technically the special guardian would be entitled to have the entire record before this court in determining the value of his services, the court is of the opinion that the estate should not be involved in a considerable expenditure for unnecessary printing in view of the appellants’ assertion that there is sufficient in the record now before the court to determine the value of the services. The court agrees with appellants’ view and is of the opinion that the special guardian’s services were of the value determined by the surrogate. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county allowing certain proposed amendments to ease on appeal reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. While technically the special guardian would be entitled to have the entire record before this court in determining the value of his services, the court is of the opinion that the estate should not be involved in a considerable expenditure for unnecessary printing in view of the appellants’ assertion that there is sufficient in the record now before the court to determine the value of the services. The court agrees with appellants’ view and is of the opinion that the special guardian’s services were of the value determined by the surrogate. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 905, 290 N.Y.S. 715, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-manufacturers-trust-co-nyappdiv-1936.