In re Manuel S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Manuel S.

216 A.D.2d 569, 628 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7580

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 569 (In re Manuel S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Manuel S., 216 A.D.2d 569, 628 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), dated May 3, 1993, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated October 23, 1992, determining, upon her admission, that the child Manuel S. was neglected, discharged the child to the custody of the father.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The record indicates that the mother made an admission to having neglected the child and consented to the disposition of the court. As the only issue raised on appeal concerns the propriety of the dispositional order, the appeal should be dismissed as no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N. Y. [Tabitha McC.], 202 AD2d 502; Matter of Cherilyn P., 192 AD2d 1084; CPLR 5511). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), dated May 3, 1993, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated October 23, 1992, determining, upon her admission, that the child Manuel S. was neglected, discharged the child to the custody of the father.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The record indicates that the mother made an admission to having neglected the child and consented to the disposition of the court. As the only issue raised on appeal concerns the propriety of the dispositional order, the appeal should be dismissed as no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N. Y. [Tabitha McC.], 202 AD2d 502; Matter of Cherilyn P., 192 AD2d 1084; CPLR 5511). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 569, 628 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-manuel-s-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack