in Re Manuel Quinones

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 4, 2004
Docket04-04-00503-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Manuel Quinones (in Re Manuel Quinones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Manuel Quinones, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-04-00503-CV
IN RE Manuel QUINONES
Original Mandamus Proceeding (1)

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Catherine Stone, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 4, 2004

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator, Manuel Quinones, seeks mandamus relief directing the trial court to issue a bench warrant and schedule a hearing on relator's motion for show cause hearing. Quinones seeks a show cause hearing on whether his appointed attorney in a DNA testing proceeding is taking the necessary action. The copy of relator's motion attached to his petition is not file-stamped by the district clerk.

A trial judge has a duty to consider and rule on motions within a reasonable time. In re Ramirez, 994 S.W.2d 682, 683 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). To invoke this duty, however, the movant must show that he brought the motion to the trial judge's attention, and the trial judge failed or refused to rule. In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding); Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding). Merely filing the matter with the district clerk does not impute knowledge of the pleading to the trial court. In re Flores, No. 04-03-00449-CV, 2003 WL 21480964 (Tex. App.--San Antonio June 25, 2003, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication). In this case, Quinones has failed to provide proof of the date on which he filed the motion or evidence that he has brought the motion to the trial judge's attention. Accordingly, Quinones has failed to show that he is entitled to mandamus relief, and Quinones' petition is denied.

1. This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 98-12-10057, styled The State of Texas v. Manuel Quinones, pending in the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas, the Honorable Ricardo H. Garcia presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Chavez
62 S.W.3d 225 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Barnes v. State
832 S.W.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
In Re Ramirez
994 S.W.2d 682 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Manuel Quinones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-manuel-quinones-texapp-2004.