In re Manning

Wisconsin Supreme Court

In re Manning

45 N.W. 26, 76 Wis. 365, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 97

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 18, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 45 N.W. 26 (In re Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Manning, 45 N.W. 26, 76 Wis. 365, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 97 (Wis. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Eton, J.

In November, 1889, an information was exhibited against the petitioner in the municipal court of the city and county of Ashland, charging him with the crime of manslaughter, upon which he was tried and convicted in said court, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for three years, and is now so imprisoned. The facts in his case, in all other respects, are like those in In re Burke, ante, p. 357, except that this petitioner pleaded in abatement the facts stated in his petition, which are substantially the same as are stated in Burke’s petition. The plea was overruled, and is of no significance upon this application. The matter is ruled by the decision in Burlce's Case, from which it is not distinguishable in principle.

By the Court.— The application for a writ of habeas cor~ pus is denied, and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eton, J.

In November, 1889, an information was exhibited against the petitioner in the municipal court of the city and county of Ashland, charging him with the crime of manslaughter, upon which he was tried and convicted in said court, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for three years, and is now so imprisoned. The facts in his case, in all other respects, are like those in In re Burke, ante, p. 357, except that this petitioner pleaded in abatement the facts stated in his petition, which are substantially the same as are stated in Burke’s petition. The plea was overruled, and is of no significance upon this application. The matter is ruled by the decision in Burlce's Case, from which it is not distinguishable in principle.

By the Court.— The application for a writ of habeas cor~ pus is denied, and the petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 N.W. 26, 76 Wis. 365, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-manning-wis-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack