In re Manning

45 N.W. 26, 76 Wis. 365, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 97
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 1890·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Eton, J.

In November, 1889, an information was exhibited against the petitioner in the municipal court of the city and county of Ashland, charging him with the crime of manslaughter, upon which he was tried and convicted in said court, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for three years, and is now so imprisoned. The facts in his case, in all other respects, are like those in In re Burke, ante, p. 357, except that this petitioner pleaded in abatement the facts stated in his petition, which are substantially the same as are stated in Burke’s petition. The plea was overruled, and is of no significance upon this application. The matter is ruled by the decision in Burlce's Case, from which it is not distinguishable in principle.

By the Court.— The application for a writ of habeas cor~ pus is denied, and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Manning, 45 N.W. 26, 76 Wis. 365, 1890 Wisc. LEXIS 97 (Wis. 1890).

45 N.W. 26 (In re Manning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Bales v. Bailey
118 N.W. 676 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Strange v. Oconto Land Co.
117 N.W. 1023 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1908)
Warden v. Bayfield County
58 N.W. 248 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1894)
In re Radl
57 N.W. 1105 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1894)
Baker v. State
50 N.W. 518 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1891)