In re Manning
This text of 206 F. 685 (In re Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter comes up on a petition to review an order of the referee in bankruptcy allowing a claim on behalf of one A. I,. Calhoun as a preferred claim secured by' a mortgage of the crops of the bankrupt.
“And also all the crop or crops (which are acknowledged and agreed to be personal property) whether matured or unmatured, gathered or ungathered, raised or to be raised by me (the word ‘me’ written) during the year 1912 (the figures 12 written).”
This mortgage the trustee in bankruptcy claims to be invalid and void under the terms of section 4103 of the Code of Laws of S. C. 1912, which declares that:
“No chattel mortgage, except mortgages or deeds of trust covering the whole or any part of the real or personal property of a railroad company or manufacturing company, shall be valid or good to convey any interest or right whatever to the mortgagee unless the property mortgaged shall be described in writing, or typewriting, but not printing, on the face of the-mortgage.”
This section has been held by the Supreme Court of South Carolina to be valid and constitutional and that a mortgage of crops when contained in a printed clause as an attempted chattel mortgage was void. Rose v. Harllee, 69 S. C. 523, 48 S. E. 541.
It is. ordered that the order of the referee in bankruptcy allowing this mortgage as a good and valid mortgage of the crops of the bankrupt be and the same is hereby reversed, and it is hereby adjudged that the mortgage or paper purporting to be a chattel mortgage dated April 4, 1912, made by the bankrupt, Marshall Manning, to A. L. Calhoun,, is null, void, and of no effect as a mortgage of the crops of the bankrupt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 F. 685, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-manning-southcarolinaed-1913.