In Re Mann

588 S.E.2d 588, 356 S.C. 237, 2003 S.C. LEXIS 263
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 24, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant *238 to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with the serious crimes of second degree burglary and Peeping Tom.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Mann, 588 S.E.2d 588, 356 S.C. 237, 2003 S.C. LEXIS 263 (S.C. 2003).

588 S.E.2d 588 (In Re Mann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Mann
647 S.E.2d 175 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2007)