in Re Manhattan Vaughn, JVP

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 2015
Docket01-15-00349-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Manhattan Vaughn, JVP (in Re Manhattan Vaughn, JVP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Manhattan Vaughn, JVP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Manhattan | Vaughn, JVP

Appellate case number: 01-15-00349-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-76550

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

On April 20, 2015, relator, Manhattan | Vaughn, JVP, filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s April 10, 2015 “Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Manhattan | Vaughn, JVP’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production.” In conjunction with its petition, relator filed a motion requesting a temporary stay of the trial court’s order pending this Court’s resolution of the petition. On April 22, 2015, the real parties in interest filed a response (1) stating that they are unopposed to relator’s request for a temporary stay of the trial court’s order and (2) informing this Court that they intend to file a response addressing the merits of the petition. Accordingly, relator’s motion for a temporary stay of the trial court’s order is granted and it is ordered that the trial court’s April 10, 2015 order in the above-referenced trial court cause is stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the mandamus petition in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. See id. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(c). It is further ordered that the real parties in interest file their response to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on or before Wednesday, May 20, 2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 23, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Manhattan Vaughn, JVP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-manhattan-vaughn-jvp-texapp-2015.