In re Manelin S.
108 A.D.3d 1208, 968 N.Y.S.2d 922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 19, 2013·No. (Appeal No. 2.)·Published
Opinion
— Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R. Griffith, J), entered April 25, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, inter alia, adjudged that respondent had neglected the subject child.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
[1209] Same memorandum as in Matter of Christy S. v Phonesavanh S. (108 AD3d 1207 [2013]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Fahey, Garni and Lindley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Manelin S., 108 A.D.3d 1208, 968 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
108 A.D.3d 1208 (In re Manelin S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
S., CHRISTY v. S., PHONESAVANH
108 A.D.3d 1207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)