In re Mandell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mandell

126 A.D.2d 771, 511 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41934

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 771 (In re Mandell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mandell, 126 A.D.2d 771, 511 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by petitioner, Irving Mandell, a suspended attorney and counselor-at-law, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement to the Bar of the State of New York and to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department to investigate and report its findings on (1) whether the petitioner complied with this court’s order of suspension and (2) whether petitioner presently possesses the character and fitness requisite to an attorney and counselor-at-law.

The application for reinstatement will be held in abeyance pending the Committee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by petitioner, Irving Mandell, a suspended attorney and counselor-at-law, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement to the Bar of the State of New York and to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

The matter is referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial Department to investigate and report its findings on (1) whether the petitioner complied with this court’s order of suspension and (2) whether petitioner presently possesses the character and fitness requisite to an attorney and counselor-at-law.

The application for reinstatement will be held in abeyance pending the Committee’s report. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Bracken and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 771, 511 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mandell-nyappdiv-1987.