In re Mandel
This text of 846 A.2d 594 (In re Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CORRECTED ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-301, concluding that SAMUEL MANDEL of MOORESTOWN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with the client), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect); and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that SAMUEL MANDEL is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective May 24, 2004; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
846 A.2d 594, 179 N.J. 422, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mandel-nj-2004.