Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Malvey

In re Malvey

259 A.D. 716, 19 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 716 (In re Malvey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Malvey, 259 A.D. 716, 19 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and the motion granted. There is nothing in the Election Law which requires that the signature of a witness appearing on a nominating petition shall be identical in form with the signature appearing on the registration book. Identity of person is all that is required. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 716, 19 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-malvey-nyappdiv-1940.