In re Maliek L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Maliek L.

283 A.D.2d 192, 724 N.Y.S.2d 600, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4240

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 192 (In re Maliek L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Maliek L., 283 A.D.2d 192, 724 N.Y.S.2d 600, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about October 15, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute attempted robbery in the second degree, and placing appellant on probation for a period of 24 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The credible evidence clearly established the elements of attempted robbery in the second degree in that appellant and his companions menaced the victim with weapons and explicitly demanded money (see, People v Bracey, 41 NY2d 296). Concur— Lemer, J. P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about October 15, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant had committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute attempted robbery in the second degree, and placing appellant on probation for a period of 24 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The credible evidence clearly established the elements of attempted robbery in the second degree in that appellant and his companions menaced the victim with weapons and explicitly demanded money (see, People v Bracey, 41 NY2d 296). Concur— Lemer, J. P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 192, 724 N.Y.S.2d 600, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maliek-l-nyappdiv-2001.