In re Male H.
79 N.Y.2d 1026
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of [1027] the Appellate Division order as affirmed that part of Family Court’s order which denied in part a motion to vacate a default, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Male H., 79 N.Y.2d 1026 (N.Y. 1992).
79 N.Y.2d 1026 (In re Male H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Nasir Levon L.
110 A.D.3d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)