In re Malashia B.
71 A.D.3d 1495, 895 N.Y.S.2d 914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Malashia B.. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.D.3d 1493 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 2010·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Bryan R. Hedges, J.), entered February 27, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order denied the motion of respondent Constance B. seeking, inter alia, posttermination contact with the subject child.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Malashia B. (71 AD3d 1493 [2010]). Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Green and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Malashia B., 71 A.D.3d 1495, 895 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).
71 A.D.3d 1495 (In re Malashia B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Malashia B.
71 A.D.3d 1493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)