In re Maker

117 P.3d 880, 280 Kan. 1, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 450
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedAugust 24, 2005
DocketBar Docket No. 20409
StatusPublished

This text of 117 P.3d 880 (In re Maker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Maker, 117 P.3d 880, 280 Kan. 1, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 450 (kan 2005).

Opinion

In a letter signed on August 10, 2005, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Joshua M. Maker of Overland Park, Kansas, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 296).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a panel hearing was pending on four complaints in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 211 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 275). The complaints concerned allegations of misconduct that Maker violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 342), 1.3 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 354), 1.4 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 367), 3.2 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 440), 4.1 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 460), 8.4(a), (c), (d) and (g) (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 485).

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Joshua M. Maker, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Joshua M. Maker from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2004 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 301).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 P.3d 880, 280 Kan. 1, 2005 Kan. LEXIS 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maker-kan-2005.