In re Major

693 A.2d 466, 149 N.J. 243, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 161
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 21, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 693 A.2d 466 (In re Major) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Major, 693 A.2d 466, 149 N.J. 243, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 161 (N.J. 1997).

Opinion

[244]*244ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on January 22, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JAMES A. MAJOR, II, of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1960, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES A. MAJOR, II, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 A.2d 466, 149 N.J. 243, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-major-nj-1997.