In re Maisel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Maisel

260 A.D. 802, 22 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 9, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 802 (In re Maisel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Maisel, 260 A.D. 802, 22 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs and matter remitted to Special Term, Kangs County, to take proof as to whether the name of Emanuel Celler, as designee for Congress, was placed on the petitions with the names of Alexander H. Katz, as designee for State Senator in the Seventh Senatorial District, Kings County, and Jule L. Maisel, as designee for Member of Assembly, Sixth Assembly District, Kings County, respectively, for the purpose of inducing electors to believe that said Alexander H. Katz and Jule L. Maisel were designees of the Regular Democratic Organization, or, that said Emanuel Celler was allied with them and in sympathy with their designations. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 804. See, also, post, p. 805.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs and matter remitted to Special Term, Kangs County, to take proof as to whether the name of Emanuel Celler, as designee for Congress, was placed on the petitions with the names of Alexander H. Katz, as designee for State Senator in the Seventh Senatorial District, Kings County, and Jule L. Maisel, as designee for Member of Assembly, Sixth Assembly District, Kings County, respectively, for the purpose of inducing electors to believe that said Alexander H. Katz and Jule L. Maisel were designees of the Regular Democratic Organization, or, that said Emanuel Celler was allied with them and in sympathy with their designations. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 804. See, also, post, p. 805.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 802, 22 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maisel-nyappdiv-1940.