In re Maioriello

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Maioriello

658 A.2d 722, 140 N.J. 320, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 553

DecidedJune 5, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 658 A.2d 722 (In re Maioriello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Maioriello, 658 A.2d 722, 140 N.J. 320, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 553 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on April 26, 1995, recommending that JOHN J. MAIOR-IELLO of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, be reprimanded for violation of RPC 1.15(b) (failure to keep proper books and records), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate) in a number of matters, and for practicing law while ineligible to do so, and good cause appearing;

[321]*321It is ORDERED that JOHN J. MAIORIELLO is hereby reprimanded, and it is farther

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on April 26, 1995, recommending that JOHN J. MAIOR-IELLO of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, be reprimanded for violation of RPC 1.15(b) (failure to keep proper books and records), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate) in a number of matters, and for practicing law while ineligible to do so, and good cause appearing;

[321]*321It is ORDERED that JOHN J. MAIORIELLO is hereby reprimanded, and it is farther

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 A.2d 722, 140 N.J. 320, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-maioriello-nj-1995.