In re Mahamadou H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Mahamadou H.

99 A.D.3d 528, 951 N.Y.2d 868

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.3d 528 (In re Mahamadou H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Mahamadou H., 99 A.D.3d 528, 951 N.Y.2d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its finding that the victim had a sufficient opportunity to observe appellant and make a reliable identification. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its finding that the victim had a sufficient opportunity to observe appellant and make a reliable identification. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.3d 528, 951 N.Y.2d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mahamadou-h-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack