In re Magnola

768 A.2d 1055, 167 N.J. 68, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 345
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 9, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 768 A.2d 1055 (In re Magnola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Magnola, 768 A.2d 1055, 167 N.J. 68, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 345 (N.J. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-15(k) a recommendation that MICHAEL L. MAGNOLA of WESTFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, be suspended from the practice of law and compelled to pay a monetary sanction to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for failure to comply with the determination of the District XII Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. XII-9955F, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL L. MAGNOLA be temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective May 7, 2001, and until respondent satisfies the award of the District XII Fee Arbitration Committee in Docket No. XII-99-55F and pays a sanction of $500 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee; provided, however, this Order shall be vacated automatically if prior to • the effective date of the suspension, the Disciplinary Review Board reports to the Court that respondent has satisfied all financial obligations under this Order or has submitted and is current under an installment payment plan approved by the Board; and it is further

[69]*69ORDERED that if respondent seeks to be heard on this matter, he shall file with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of the file date of this Order a written request for the issuance of an Order to Show Cause; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 A.2d 1055, 167 N.J. 68, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-magnola-nj-2001.