In re Magner
This text of 356 S.E.2d 843 (In re Magner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Original Jurisdiction.
ORDER
Respondent Richard James Magner has tendered his resignation with stipulation that he will never apply for readmission, to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.
The Respondent is before the Court pursuant to a complaint concerning violation of the Disciplinary Rules. The Respondent has admitted ethical infractions and has submitted his resignation, conditioned upon never reapplying for admission. The Court considers it would be in the best interest of justice to grant the resignation.
AND IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the resignation of Richard James Magner be accepted. He shall deliver his Certificate of Admission to Practice to the Clerk of the Supreme Court within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, and his name shall be irrevocably stricken from the roll of attorneys.
In addition, he shall promptly notify, or cause to be notified, by certified mail, return receipt requested, all clients currently being represented by pending matters in this State, of his resignation.
He shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Supreme Court within fifteen (15) days of the issuance of this Order showing that he has fully complied with the provisions of this Order.
Let this Order be published with the Opinions of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 S.E.2d 843, 292 S.C. 407, 1987 S.C. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-magner-sc-1987.